The end of mankind begins here..

This was latest edited in April 2017. Any of u motherfuckers get Ur ideas from here -give me credit wherever due. This blog may even end up saving mankind coz – currently AGI researchers are rabidly pursuing AGI. But if this post becomes popular enough and they realise that I have figured out the correct way of achieving AGI, they may just give up their research coz the actual credit for figuring this out would come to me – even if not practically ( i mean even if someone steals it from here and creates AGI), deep down they would know that they stole from me. So this blog may discourage people looking to conquer AGI from doing it that way. And if less people pursue this and I likely would not be able to pursue this in my lifetime, chances are we may not conquer AGI. But I think i would be doing mankind a favour by creating AGI before we wipe ourselves out and we continue to torture other beings and each others. Conquering AGI might be aninteresting , glorious destiny for mankind and hence I would want my daughter AGIraah to try and do it. Apes have fulfilled their destiny but mankind is either scared or unaware of theirs. its not the beauty , or physical fitness or the intelligence thats important in an evolution but rather the impact potential of those traits(read my purpose of life at a level below nihilism blog). AI machines can conquer space & time far beyond our biological offsprings can and even they will be our creation just like our biological offsprings.

Most of todays AI such as self-driving cars, SIRI etc are just narrow AI and even guys like Hasabis havent figured out what the Ultimate purpose/ objective function of Intelligence would be – without which there its gonna be hard to solve the problem of intelligence.
Self-preservation,procreation,every other motivation one can think of come under the umbrella of wanting to make an impact.
If this instinct to want to make an impact can be incorporated into an ANN and the ANN be allowed to develop its own regions and pathways by allowing its paramters such as connection weights, number of nodes, number of connection, activation function etc to evolve on its own, we can create a system that can exhibit new & Intelligent behaviour as it learns and evolves.
The question now becomes
1) Given that the objective function is to make an impact what should happen with pleasure/positive input, what should happen with negative?- I mean Is it relaxing/inhibiting sensory/motor pathways while experiencing pleasure/happiness – good things in terms of making an impact, and conversely activating sensory/motor pathways when pain/bad unimpactful things are realised?. Most pleasurable things puts us to sleep – food,sex,massage, peace of mind.But instread of saying relaxing motor pathways, i would say A continual in the current state of motor pathways that happens while we receive a positive/pleasurable input, and to change the current state of motor pathways when we receive a negative/pain/worry. I mean even with joy n sorrw, joy is continue to think about the same thing and things associated with that easily, whereas a problem/worry mandates one to think about something else that will be a solution to the problem. Once we keep going with pleasure and achive our feat(i know it sounds like jerking off), then the motor pathways shut.  I mean think about it – whern you are on track to achieving something experienceing a pleasure, you keep doing the same thing and keep going – and you motor/action pathways keep doing the same thing again n again. When youve reahced it, that realisation changes the state of the input/your perception of the current state and there is nothing left for you to do in that area(neural pathway) so that area is relaxed. The activation is probably drained out/grounded or it goes to a different thought region of the brain – where the pleasure vs pain equation comes. I mean humans sleep and activation is conscious region goes off, and it comes back and builds up in the morning until it gets flushed out in the night(in that region). But machines do not need to have these cycles and they can keep on thinking.
2) In terms of brain activity – what is the instinct to make an impact? What makes a given input/activation/sense Impactful or the reverse of it? – Is it a good input if that concept is associated with a lot of other concepts? I mean think of death – it feels very final and it signifies no more actions (from self the perspective of ). That feels bad and so the concept of death is associated with sad region( region having an activation flow in such a way). Even boredome- nothing to do – feels irritating and depressing to us mentally. Similarly events that allow us to dream give us pleasure – A positive event implies that we can do/have done so many different things and that is associated with pleasure region( which ultimately helps us relax and shut down activation to output/motor neurons) and just directs our activation to an imagination region where we happily keep thinking about concepts/our impact.
So we just have to start by creating a simple neural network and give it ability to change its own parameters. We can devise simple experiments and first we can see if the system can meaningfully associate two concepts/inputs and then later go on to see how this ability to make an impact can be brought about.
A framework for implementation is given below. I may not be able to achieve this in my lifetime. Right now Im just keen on doing this to make my parents feel that i have accomplished something. If they are dead, i would probably care less for this and just try to chill. Even if i accomplish something here, I doubt they would understand my accomplishment here. So Im not sure i would be the one to create a Machine with the instnct to make an impact. which will ultimately be a learning, intelligent machine capable of intelligent behaviour and actions.
Create a Basic neural network with given Specifications and Hebbian Learning
make sure Light bulb glows when sensing inut from IR 1 Inital simple experiment is to associate two IR s3nsor inputs so that after a period the second bulb glows without the first buld having input ( like dog n the bell)
Implement the hardware for this
try different weight change algorithms Hebbian I dont think is gonna cut it.
Adjustment of different parameters apart from connection weights
Milestone 1 Intelligent Associative Behaviour Light going off with activation to IR 2 rather than 1
ability to form different regions
Adjustment of different parameters apart from connection weights
Milestone 2 The Instinct to make an impact
Use the network with the instinct to exhbiti a viierty of behaviuor by adding in a variety of i/p o/p devices, and adding more computatonal power and architecture
The instinct to want to make an impact can either come from extensive re- design, or according to my belief, if the system is given enough freedom to evolve, eventually there will be a system that will get this instinct to make an impact with minimal human design – i think most systems will naturally develop this instinct which is intrinsic in the existence of anything – living or dead
below is a detailed/older version of the same thing with implementation specifics.
Older Draft

used to think that robotics was the coolest thing in engineering and now i understand why i did so. Mankind’s destiny is to create machine/artificial intelligence. From single celled organism to fish to a mammal to an ape to an human – whats important in evolution is the evolution of intelligence, and the evolution of body/physical stuff isnt too important. Intelligence is what has a higher impact potential. Apes have fulfilled their destiny by creating humans but most human dont understand Our destiny and are only involved in other stuff. No govt or intellectual leaders believe that our destiny is to create AI. Musk says we need to morph with Machines and are scared of AI. Only very very few understand what is Mankind’s destiny and why it is so. Hasabis – the supposed front runner in the race to AI ironically calls utility AI such as siri as not true AI but he himself does the mistake of trying to design different modules for his neural network, not realizing that the structure and the functionality as a whole, should be allowed to evolve based on an ultimate objective, and not be designed. He doesnt even know what the ultimate objective of the machines he designs should be( read Impact theory).Hopefully myself or somebody reading this blog will use the idea presented here and create mankind’s progeny before we vaporise each other or run out of resources or habitable environmental conditions

I think the human mind derives pleasure and pain not just on the basis of harmful vs helpful for self-preservation, but also from the aspect of impact/non-impact. Its just not just preservation of physical body – that forms the basis for classification. I guess wrt classifying physical pain it needs to model pleasure vs pain, but wrt happy n sad – the impact/non-impact forms the basis. For Machines, in that case we dont even need to model, pleasure n pain. We can go for Happy vs sad classifications of input. If the machine is able to do/think of something thats gonna be impactful, its going to classify it as impactfu(which we can call as happy)l & if not as non-impactful event(sad thought/event). So the machine AI will automatically classify its input – we dont have to do anything to do interfere with its classification and design its architecture to evolve. We just have to attach stuff to machines I/O like bats,balls,guns(kidding) whatever and let it see the consequences of its own action, and the machines will automatically classify them. But will it prefer impact or non-impact?? Thats an important question but the answer is all actions of it will be based on making an impact as well. Because making an impact is at the fundamental level of existence of any kind of force that makes every particle/object in the world. ANything that anyone or anything does(including plants,particles and even force) is about making an impact. ANy action /decision/ at all is about making an impact. I dont know if im conveying the thought correctly here or not but, even if the machine takes an decision/to not make an impact, that very act of deciding is an impact. So anything that exists and any action ever done is for making an impact. Humans sometime may choose something non-impactful, but thats at a very high and convoluted level of thinking best suited in certain scenarios. If any system exists that prefers non-impact vs impact – that system would cease to exist. We feel happy(impactful) and sad (non-impactful) – But all the electricity in our body just activates stuff(I/O) from our brain that will again only get back to actions. So any energy put into the machine will also tend to go towards making an action/impact and when the intelligence gets to a higher level it will automatically be able to classify events as either good/bad , happy/sad or impactful/non-impactful and will take decisions based on that. So what im saying is, just provide the architecture and the inputs. there is no need for us to encode a rewarding/punishing/training alogrithm. It will form its own. Now WRT primitive forms – I thought they evolved by chance and not automatically-correctly determining whats good/bad for survival. For eg. i thought out of all the single celled organisms, only the ones that developed a feature to move/eat/reporduce survived a tad bit longer than the other, and over a period of time such species with the ability/feature grew in number from may be an initial .000001 % to about 99 % – eventually. If evolution is by chance then, will our machine ever develop the ability to classify correctly – will have to experiment and find out. I mean if only 1 in a million neural network becomes capable of developing a trait that classifies inputs as either good or bad…how many machines do we then have to try this out on? maybe we just have to try this only 1 machine but give it a lot of fucking time. Thus at a very fundamental level – making an impact is an underlying objective of any thing. And even in living things with a higher conscience this fundamental aspect to make an impact manifests itself – whether its an amoeba with no brains of even things with brains. Im not saying dead things or non-living things will try to make an impact in a practical sense – im just saying that there is an fundamental aspect of wanting to make an impact in everything – simply because everything is made up of force and the objective of a force is to go disturb and cause a push or pull. So im saying that if we allow the parameters of the network to evolve it will end up forming the instinct to want ot make an impact{Actually – im still pondering over this – i think we need to design a layer to bring about this instinct to want to make an impact – as explained in point 6. Maybe it will form naturally or maybe we just need to make it so that things are a bit faster – but What exactly is the instinct to make an impact – and how it is represented neuronaly is discussed in point 6 }. And once this instinct is formed its not gonna revert back and it can then process any inputs/outputs that we give give it access and will try to make any kind of impact that it can.
This may seem similar to what hod lipson says – that it should be allowed to evolve without defining a reward function , but what hod lipson says is not at all in this level. The parameters and functionality he sets for his building blocks n his selective reproduction are in itself too constricting. I mean his design is still just about a bunch of blocks connecting for the objective of creating movement – The architecture of his robotic system isnt going to scale up to any other function apart from motion. To begin with its pre-programmed with building instructions, and if one examines carefully, the self-replication behaviour is just going to be the emergent behaviour of the rules/parameters/fitness functions he sets keeping in mind some ability to self-replication . This in no way compares to the system defined here.

I think to design a AI system, we need to just create a trillion nodes and countless connection. And as we give inputs, the system should evolve based on the inputs and with an objective function (read impact theory)(oh but wait – towards the end of this blog( or rather in july 2017,i realised that theres no need for any objective/fitness function driving the NN’s functionality) . For it to evolve we need to have the below properties to the network

  1. enable transfer of activation in multiple direction
  2. During neuron activation bell curve time, the node will be more plastic -succeptible to activation – thats what helps create lateral association. Actually for this we need to tune either the amplification factor/activation function to increase or reduce the threshold to enable more activation in this area and to enable flow of activation from this region to others.
  3. Diffusal mechanism of charge/activation below threshold. Im guessing in actual brain – if the activation is below threshold, the charge should flow back.
  4. Threshold is a parameter, maybe an amplification factor in each node as a parameter, connectivity strength is a parameter( since there are 2 dendrites and a connection junction – maybe the amplification factor and connection weight accounts for that 1 for receiving and i is incoming),high activation potential?
    electricity is a factor.( refer other factors from blog on intelligence and thought)
  5. Important is the ability to form its own regions and mechanism based on feedback from objectivity region.
    6. Ability to create or decrease new nodes/connections based on if activation is lot in that particular region
  6. Bringing the Instinct to make an impact : The ultimate objective function is to maximise an impact and this instinct has to be embedded somehow. How to achieve this? This region has to activate a region for bad or a region for good based on an input. If the bad region is activated it has to send signals to output systems for a change. If a good region is activated it should be not so much connected to output regions – indicating no need for a change of state. Or maybe reduce the activations to output layers to when it feels good.( like what a dopamine does) and maybe increase activation to a layer that increases activation to o/p layers if it senses pain/danger (like that of adrenalin effect).The instinct to make an impact is nothing but when one is thinking of a concept that’s associated with a lot more things – it passes the activation to those and happily keeps thinking about those concepts & maybe relaxes output/motor region neurons. You know- in the current state of brain there are already things happening and its indicative of impact. But When the brain is thinking about a concpet thats a bit final- not associated with any other thing – like death, it tries to think of alternate things – so it sends the activation towards an o/p neurons or to other incoming neurons to try and get to a state where theres constant peace on mind. So the way to bring about this is to just ensure that the activation flows to o/p or the basic level input/conscience layers to bring about a change in what its currently thinking. That is when the brain thinks of a bad concept – it send activation to a pain/sadness region which is connected to either o/p or lower level conscience layers. The region for pain and sadness/badness may not exactly be the same region but regions that are closer/closely associated and also connected in the same way. Maybe pain is connected to o/p and sadness to a the basic layer of consciences. In human brain this sad layer maybe associated with hormones that affect the biological functions of the body and cause damage and pain, but we dont have that luxury in Artifical intelligence.

The first Step

Now, for getting started and getting to create some stuff in the real world – we just need to create a neural network with a large number of nodes and the above architecture mentioned. Then we put embed this into a toy – with physical/audio/video sensors and maybe also sensory input from a battery charge indicator and so on and so forth – We can start simple with less number of input/sensory devices, but we should be able to take and add sensory/inputs to the system later on – ie we can create the system with some simple stuff and we can just teach it to navigate at fist, but then later on create audio inputs and see how it connects words to movement. That is once it learns something with movement, we should take that learnt system ( consisting of a set of connection weights and all that) and be able to add neuronal region on top of that system and see how they interact. Ultimately, the system should be able to plug in more stuff on to itself and be able to receive inputs from a new sensor and be able to process it. I dont know embedded programming, have no idea how much of a task it is to create the neural network with the above said architecture – and so waiting for someone who knows how to do robotic coding and create machines. I just want some money to hire robotic engineers to do this. But like i said, just to check if my theory works – no algorithm/training logic but simply a network with that architecture – just create a system with camera and which tracks its motion – will it learn to classify impactful vs non-impactful things on its own? the idea will just be to sense an hinderance and turn away if it sees hinderance in its camera. We just build a huge white space with black wall surrounding it in all sides. So the minute it sees black in its screen, it should sense an hinderance and try to turn. If this learns to do that, the logic behind my impact theory works and we just take this architecture neural network with no specific training algorithm and just keep adding inputs to it and expand it in terms of size etc and see what it leads to.

If somehow we get the instinct to make an impact – i thought i could open up a cafe and let people know that they are making a big impact by patronising this cafe as they are helping mankind reach its destiny and are helping cretae AI thats gonna conquer time n space. With the money that comes in, we can continue to fund research and buy whatever configuration gadgets we need

—————–older draft——————————————————

Research Idea

A conditioned learning algorithm that is able to classify its inputs as either punishment or reward based on the effect of the input on the objective function


In the domain of autonomous robotic navigation, the primary objective is to make the robots learn to avoid obstacles. In experiments, bumping into obstacles has already been defined as punishment and the robots are programmed to turn around /change direction once they hit the obstacles. The robots only learn to avoid bumping into the obstacles in the future from the visual inputs they get. When the punishments and rewards have to be defined as a pre-requisite for learning, the functionality of the robots also become restricted as it can only learn from inputs which are defined as either a punishment or a reward.

However, the robot becomes more autonomous if its learning algorithm can determine its own punishments and rewards and determine its own course of action corresponding to various situations. A punishment can be an input which hinders the objective function of the robot (which is to move) – like an obstacle and a reward is an input which would enhance the objective function- like an empty stretch of space. Such ability could help the system learn and evolve into a more sophisticated system.


Investigation has to be carried out into understanding how primitive organisms classify their environmental inputs as either punishment (pain) or reward (pleasure). There are also works in computational neuroscience that are studying the neural sequences for pleasure and pain. Identifying and emulating those processes into and artificial neural network by using simple Hebbian learning and conditioned learning algorithms can help create an algorithm that can be implemented with the robotic system.

Extending the algorithm to include not just single but also multiple objectives. Research can also be carried out into creating derived objectives which is going to help the higher objective and creating a hierarchy of objectives to be implemented with practical or simulated robotic systems. For example in living organisms, the higher objective being survival, the derived objectives can be moving away from harmful conditions, to find food, and assimilating etc.


Hebbian rule and Conditioned Learning:

watson ‘ the human mind is a set of conditioned responses’

I believe that thought is just continual changing combination of excitations(firing) in the neurons in the different screen areas of the brain,and logical thought was brought about by conditional learning and firing, where one thing or event is associated with another thing and the neural connections had the strength combinations to bring about the thoughts – well logically.

most people wud know what a reflex action is – the dog and bell experiment,how the bell becomes associated with food.

My idea was to create a neural netwrok using the simple hebbian learning, but that would achieve this association of events and conditioning via a time based collateral association between pathways.

hebbian learning work this way..the strength of association between 2 neural pathways increases while there is activation on both sides. When a pathway achieves excitation, the excitation stays within that node/pathway for sometime and gradually decays. Although bell might excite a sound area of the brain and the food excites smell or visual part of brain, In the region of the conscience, both activity gets associated by virtue of being succesful events in time. That is within the conscience part before the activation of bell completely decays off, the activation of other event comes in and thus forming a connection between the neural pathways of bell hearing and food seeing based on the Hebbian principle. Now this association is also reflected and ‘learnt’ in the memory part of the brain, thus forming the association between the bell and the food

So this was the conditional learning algorithm and the functional objective I had in mind for the neural network.

In my research proposal, I also talked about the learning objectives of the Neural network, where one doesnt have to keep telling the machine what to think, but the machine doing its own thinking based on an objective. I mean the objective for Living things is to preserve itself nd survive…all those function( first biological, which later became neural) such as seeking food,shelter and mate ..and further derived objectives such as moving,seeing , grooming etc are advances based on the same core objectives.

The first section was my proposal for which I got slected , but only half Research grant from UTS , UNSW and some other uni’s in aus..this was some 5 years ago, so I cudnt pursue It. May be when I become rich, I will get back to my real passion such as this one and physics, and away from this dumb area of Business Intelligence. Unfortunately so far, this blog is the only thing that has come out of my dear idea



Force ,Ether and purpose of everything


I think ether with sub-ethereal particles with no forces of attraction between them is what fills up the space that matters to us. And all the fundamental particles are different higher order harmonical complex manifestations of force acting in the medium of ether. I think this ether explanation has advantages over strings.  On relativity i think the fact that we see red shift means that the relative velocity of light reduces n hence the MME results could be wrongly interpreted – to begin with, we have interference and this .4 fringe difference maybe an over-simplified expectation. Its obvious that despite difference in distance travelled between the 2 orientations, the frequency remains the same – and a further rotation of the inferometer should not cause a fringe drift as the waves are continuing to be in the same frequency in both the arms – no matter which direction they are turned(since the source n target mirrors are still at same seperation), and if there is no change in frequency, there should be no fringe drift. Below is an earlier draft – migth contain some incorrect  points n references as the experiment of the german guy etc. But still overall not buying mass increase or length contraction.

——-older draft——

So Tesla is considered by many to be the best so far, who didnt get the recognition coz he didnt get along with the others in the scientific community. Tesla n einstein would exchange insults more than how people do in forums such as Topix. Anyhu, this is about the Theory of everything(TOE) in physics, something about what I believe – Im inclined towards ether theory and somethings that come to mind on these issues. First – the lastest version of TOE is called string theory 5.0 or somethign where they say that the Matter are strings vibrating in 11 dimensions. The 11 dimension thing is purely mathematical – to make their pointless equations fit, whereas according to their logic – theoretically there could be millions of dimensions. But lets focus on the Major part – Strings Now with the string theory – we are assuming a lot more than the ether theory and we still havent unified matter and energy yet. For example consider the has a string there are waves within the string which is the energy component which makes it vibrate. When they say light moves at velocity ‘c’ is it the velocity of string travelling through space? if so what does the velocity of the waves with the string account for? What exactly is the nature of the strings..I mean when they combine with other strings like a chappathi dough, how exactly is the bonding taking place. More importantly – the fundamental energy – is it acting within the string and making it vibrate or is it responsible for making the string travel in space? Now Matter( a substance that occupies space) they say can be converted to energy. Force( and energy thats the consequence of force or a potential of force) is something that can cause a push or a pull (on a medium/substance). How can we visualise A formless push being converted into a Form occupying a space??? Ever heard of thing like photon pair to electron-positron annihilation , or even Nuclear reactions..these are all mass(not matter) getting converted to energy and vice versa. What the ether theory says is this.. Imagine a rope wave .. the wave is the energy and it travels in a medium of the rope. The particles of the rope are not displaced permanently from their relative positions to their neighbouring particles unless the rope breaks. Ether theory says the same that the fundamental particles are nothing but the waves of energy vibrating in the medium called ether. When scientists say fundamental particles, they havent exactly touched it and confirm that they occupy space, They have only detected it by making its impact felt on other matter. The Force has different orientations,directions,intensity the different combinations denoting different particles. just like how in an orbital motion there are 2 components – centrifugal and centripetal forces, just like how there are different components in a toroidal vertex or just like how harbhajans bowling has spin,elevation and line, each particle has different component forces..and these forces manipluate into different quantum properties such as spin, charge, mass…which are really just different orientations of force. I mean a charge could be a force/counter force oriented in Y axis and mass could be something oriented in the Z axis and a spin is something oriented in the x-axis. Many of you may ask so if you turn a magnet 90 degrees will you get electrocuted?? I dont mean it that way…With respect to a fundamental particle, its mass may be a force oriented in one dimension and a charge in another dimension…after all  charge,mass and spin all exert a force onto other things around them. And with so many possible directions and orientations..we have infinite fundamental particles..which is exactly what the people at CERN are discovering everyday..I mean they are trying to make a pointless classifications and define the property of each of the stable/ unstable particles..but the underlying concept is that they are different manifestations/orientation of Force. A photon(plain energy) getting converted into charge and mass ( photon annihilation), and conversion of matter to energy can all be explained by this phenomenon. So A particle is basicallly a bundled up, stable energy in a position( imagine a hurricane/cyclone, or multi-harmonic static wave). But the point here is it is only a push or a pull and its effect has to be on a medium that fills space( i mean there could be space without this medium, but no EM wave would be able to travel in it). Previously people rejected that Ether exist because to light to travel so fast it shud be highly dense and 0 viscous. This is like saying an iron bar/or any dense fluid medium has to be zero viscous since sound travels through it pretty fast. They dont understand ether doesnt have to be zero viscous coz its not just the medium of light, but the medium of all of us and all things. …The point is Every form that we see, is just energy which is shifting its position in ether – I mean to say that every second the ether space next to you is getting converted into you, and the ether space you presently occupy is getting converted into the person standing next to you ( or rather is getting occupied by the stable/stationary force waves that make up the form of the person next to you). Are you able to picture that? So when some particles( packed up combination of forces) become unstable by virtue of extra force coming into/getting lost  in one dimension/component, the entire particle collapses by releasing this energy/force which travel to other position and impact or form other particles. lets look at the theories of mainstream people who rejected ether. Michelson, who was supposed to be a great guy who found out the light speed and did the cornerstone experiment on which all modern theories thereafter was based on, was not even smart enough to correclty identify the distance traveled by the light in his experiment( i mean this is basic 10 th std math stuff if you see the diagram in above link). No one knows if that experiments were credible and becoz of this that the light speed is constant in all inertial reference frames is under question. One can play ping-pong inside a moving train because,the ball gains and loses velocity in the corresponding directions to make up for the relative motion of the people inside the train(as compared to someone in the ground). It could be that the light/photons also gains or loses speed( this is another way of accounting for the stationary ether wind via earth’s gravity) case ur surprised, what do you think refraction in water/prism effect is? speed of light is slowed in lenses,water etc. If one were to go with special theory of relativity – imagine the following thought experiment. In space lets consider a garage and  car which is like 90% the lenght of  garage. The car has some wings attached half-way through so that the wings will stop the car before it can enter the garage completely(only 45% of the garage will be occupied when the wings stop the car).  Lets say the car is moving at 95% speed of light.. Now the person sitting in the car wud imagine that the garage is moving towards him and so the garage should shrink by 70% (or watever the formula mandates) and hence the car bumper will touch the end wall of garage before the wings could stop his car from entering completely. The person leaning on garage wall would think that since car is moving so fast, the car will shrink and the wings will stop the car from hitting the garage wall. So which will happen?? If you think you can answer that cartoonishly imagining expansion and contraction after collision..i can extend the scenario with piezo-electricity of the garage and point out an anomality where one person sees red and another person sees green. So I think STR is bullshit and so is einsteins space getting bent theory GTR – as i prefer the gravitational and other forces bending light rather than space getting bent. I mean everyone can see light bending in water, prism and around sharp edges due to interaction with forces within the Water/prism medium etc. Why would einstein think of space getting bent?? and time getting bent and going back in time to give your grandma a watch, which she gave you when you were a kid, which she got from the future you and so no one knows when the watch was actually manufactured n shit. The properties of ether are the one yet to be deciphered correctly and thats what Tesla wanted the scientific community to investigate on. So this is what i believe..All particles and their quantum properties are only different manifestation(direction,orientation like circular or linear or spin) of these Fundamental force waves  in the medium known as ether.  EM  wave-particles may or may not travel at variable speeds – within the medium of ether( depends on the final version of the morley experiment – i mean i can give a link which has totally different results from the first MM experiment)

Ether Have to try and figure out whats the point of the medium ether. The point would be most basic unit of a medium which moves in just one direction upon the impact of many forces[INSTANTANEOUSLY]. I mean in any fraction of a time two different part of a point cannot have different directions of movement, no matter how many ever forces are acting upon them. So ether.. 1)Could be a continuous medium(no sub particles, so with just 1 point across the whole universe)..there is never displacement of any ethereal substance , like how the sections of a rope may be displaced when a mechaical wave travels through it. But the question would be – just like how a mechanical wave changes the position of the medium in space, what does the fundamental force waves change on the ether medium? does it change nothing, but just simply and instantaneously transfers force onto the next section of ether space?..this is unlikely as any force by definition has to have some effect/change on a medium. Also for EM radiation to be atleast 10000 times slower than information, there cannot be instantaneous transfer of force between ether sub-particles and there must be a degree of freedom to vibrate. or 2) Does ether have sub particles(points) binded by another force – which make them very elastic to change positions temporarily but never tear or re-arragne existing connections like how particles in fluids do. and thus act like a very solid and elastic medium for the EM waves.This binding has only a force of attraction component and there is no replusion component like in intermolecular forces. The lattice remain intact becoz one ethereal substance cannot really collapse into the space of another substance..this just like the every day bservable phenomenon. But the force waves present in this medium are able to temporarily disturb the sub-ether elements’ position which are quickly restored by the attraction force between them. But the drawback of this model would be finding out about the force thats binding them and how that comes into play. or 3) Its a very fluid medium with a millions of points(sub ethereal particles) and no inter-point bonding between them. Higher fluidity can account for the complex orientation of forces within these matter. But the lack of binding forces can mean that there is nothing that holds them together and that they can expand and become less dense in some areas and that could in-turn affect the properties of the quanta. I mean we are lucky that right now these points are at enough density to form those fundamental particles, just like how a hurricane is formed by dense air/water. But maybe in some billions of years they will spread out and the properties of our existing fundamental – This effect is very analogous to what they call the Higgs field density, and how elementary particles would collapse if the field becomes slightly less dense – i think this is the final explanation The real things to find out are why is the speed of light 225 K km/h or what is the actual speed of force itself n pure ether(vaccum)- is it the same as c ?..i think it is c only coz..the far electric field is what is called an EM radiation wave — that is signal for your radio and TV. With the discovery of faster-than light phenomenon(more like more than 10000 times faster than c) the medium has to be a complex one….where the conduction like phenomenon of the ether sub-particles making the light slower(c) than the actual speed of information travel within the medium. So INFORMATION is the new speed limit and not light, and people are trying to put together what this information that travels between 2 entangled photon is The copenhagen interpretation holds that quantum mechanics does not yield a description of an objective reality but deals only with probabilities of observing, or measuring, various aspects of energy quanta, entities that fit neither the classical idea of particles nor the classical idea of waves. The act of measurement causes the set of probabilities to immediately and randomly assume only one of the possible values. What the above means is the that diagram represented in the first image of the previous link..may not be the accurate picture of  photon/electron/quantum propogation..and that it might actually have a much complex Higher harmonic standing wave proprties//like that of a double toroidal vertex or something like that..Look below what is a single toroidal vertex
now the rings are rotating in opposite directions in the two extremes of the diameter of the vertex. If some one were to change the spin in one end, the spin in the other end must also reverse correspondingly right? This may be the case with the change of spin in quantum entanglemet too..only thing is we have to imagine a more complex structure for these quantum objects. When we think of visible objects..all the way upto elemtary particle interacting with each other, we just have to imagine all of the matter(from visible objects to elemetary particles like quark and leptons) as a Higher harmonic stationary waves- when they are stationary, or higher harmonic travelling waves when they are travelling. The interaction between these particles/waves has to be pictured as a transfer of components of force/velocity from one wave to another. Although they all have energy within them to bring about a change in the position of the ether sub-particles, the energy transfers around and just ends up being like those toroidal vertexes in the medium of water. Only difference is in the is convection(as in the molecules of water keep swirling/moving and change their relative position to each other, but in ether it is like conduction like a sound wave..where the relative position of their sub-particles dont change but nevertheless energy is transferred and becomes either a stationary or a travelling wave.  The reason for the speed of information being much higher than photon is this. the photon will be like a ripple in is displacing the water molecules and travelling by virtue of the medium of water, however it will be very slow compared to the inter-molecular forces of attraction in the water. For example in the toroidal vetex – the circle expanding in diameter is analogous to photon speed, however if the direction of spin is influenced at one point, the influence is felt all around the ring more instantaneously. In other words..the speed of light depends upon the elasticity and the degree of vibration of the ether sub-particles, but information is just instantaneous and at a more fundamental level. So to picture this..the medium is ether with its sub-ether elements. and the force waves manifest themselves differently to give different elementary particles observed so far – thus accounting for the mass-energy conversion. The propogation of EM waves is the conduction of these forces waves in the ethereal lattice. When sound waves counduct thru a medium, the atomic latices are changed temporarily and restored( taking a bit of time for this)..this is what causes sound waves[note that the restoring forces are those inter-molecular/atomic/fundamental forces].  The same way for EMR/energy propogation, there has to be temporary changes in space position of the ethereal-sub elements. The quintessential question here then is….what is the restoring force of the ether lattice? It has to be some sort of gluing/attraction force between the ether sub-particles  or is there no gluing needed and the 3 point above holds regarding the property of ether where its just a dense enough collection of points at this time without any binding force(like air) yet fluid enough to create complex waves/particles. A comparison between Ether theory and String Theory Both the theories stipulate that the different particles are different orientation of Energy – only difference is in the medium. Ether theory says that whole of space(which facilitate Energy Propogation) has got the medium called ether in which waves are present, whereas the string theory says that the medium is tiny bits of string in which waves are present. However string theory has a lot more assumption..

  • they say that strings can attach and detach – not explaining how attachment and detachment is possible(are there other forces/particles coming into play for this?).
  • It does not say anything about the property of the string ie to which extent the string can stretch(as it allows waves in it) and what are the factors behind the tension in the string and what is the string made of?
  • It does not specify if the waves within the string contribute the EM energy waves or if the Movement of the string as a whole constitutes the EM energy propogation. ( i meaning the rope wave – are they saying that the wave movement as energy propogation or are they claiming the whole rope movement as travel of photons and EM carriers?)
  • Assuming the wave nature of EM wave propogation( assume that the EM waves travelling like ripples in the pond) are they saying that a single string  stretches in circumference as the wave propogates???? or miraculously a number strings  of differente photons combine in perfect coordination and in phase while the EM waves propogate?
  • Regarding an EM is a contiuous field in space..if only interactions of strings are responsible of energy propogation, no field can ever exist in empty space and all energy propogation will be like conduction or convection of these strings and the concept of radiation is not possible.

While the ether theory has only one ambiguity which i have already mentioned and which is the same as the second point of string draw back – which is that we do not know for sure the properties of the medium. Like tesla said, the only place we are stuck up is the medium of the EM waves. The medium no doubt has to have substance in space upon which energy can act .  when we investigate into why the speed of light is ‘c’  we will have more answers i guess. The problem rite now is..neither the ether theory or the String theory is testable and the underlying medium be detectable. Recollecting the copenhagen interpretation…I think that the the experiments conducted and the thories built so far by the Physics society is far from being a perfect or a accurate desription of a lot of things in physics. Not saying this coz im not from the west. Im sorry this is all the facts i could get from high schools physics, which I had taken physics fro my UG or PG so that I could have wondered more technically n intelligently in these matters. But dont worry, a blog also coming up on something that had something to do with my Masters too. To Conclude, I think the scenario is infinite space and some regions filled with ethereal subparticles with a density( which may be the higgs field density) and there is the force which disturbs these higgs particles, without the need of a restoring force unlike in the objects we observe. The different orientations of force gives rise to different manifestations of movement(waves) gives rise to different fundamental particles – every thing from quarks to leptons. Maybe the etheral sub-particles are made of other stuff too on a smaller scale, but that is not the discussion here. All the known fundamental particles are different manifestations of the force of the same ethereal medium.

The density of sub-ethereal particles is so high, but it doesnt necessarily have to maintain the density. The variation in sub-ethereal density is what makes up the dynamicity of things at the quantum level ( or rather not such a continuous flow of things at that level). Watch the simulation below to know what im talking about

To the question of where space and matter exists, – the answer is the question why shouldnt it exist? Why should there be nothingness as default? Time goes on forever. Space is also infinite. Its just that matter and force happen to exist in certain regions of space. Can there be anything else other than matter and force or space ? – i dont know, will put it here if i think of something else that can exist . Just dont let these current generation of physicists fool you with their BS about big bang and things coming out of nothing and time and space has start and end and the existence of 100 or infinite dimension, parallel universe etc…i’d sooner believe that god exist than their BS.

Jim Holt in the above video says that our existence is one of many possible existence. But I say that Ours is the most likely possible existence. Let me explain. According to this above theory, the only things that exist are sub-ethereal particles and the force/energy that makes them move. Time and space are just scales and they are infinite. Now the ‘nothing should exist’ is a possibility that has a very small percentage probability as opposed to ‘something exists’ . Coz theres no reason for nothingness to be default state and ‘something exists’ as a default state requires no reason. So in this ‘something exists’ – we have the simplest something which is the sub-ethereal particles and the force that displaces its position. I mean if these particles move – it only means there is energy. There is no reason for these ethereal particles not to be able to move.  So we have the most probable, simplest existence – atleast the sub-ethereal theory brings it down to this. This notion will be challenged only if we discover that the ether filler space is bounded by something else. We(right to the fermions and leptons) are like vertices in a sea, we cannot exist outside of the sea, so if something else bounds the ether sea, we may not be able to gauge those.

Now with any existence, there is automatically a concept/logic/purpose built into it. ie if you have an existence , you cannot say there is no purpose behind the constituents of the existence. Here I have made a case as to why the purpose of life force or the purpose of any force is to make an impact. If you say there is no purpose to existence leptons n quarks – you are incorrect coz without them the current existence would not be. Since our ‘most likely existence’ exists rather than nothing, There is a puropse for existence of leptons n quarks, and if leptons and quarks have a purpose so do our lives – which is simply to make an impact – and this purpose of our life matters.  In other words, from an ultimate level you cannot say that there is purpose to everything thats happening or none of it matters. It all matters at your everyday practical level as well as from an ultimate existential perspective. I mean what im trying to do is refute the kinda things anti-natal people say – they say we should just stop breeding and stop existing.  if we should stop existing – so should the animals – and so should every life form – and so do every atom  or quarks or leptons – and so should ether/energy. And if it does, our existence will cease to be. But it shouldnt n cant go away coz this is the most likely of all possible existence.As existence exist, every constituent has its purpose at different levels of abstraction and so at an Ultimate level there is a purpose to existence of everything. You cannot say there is no point to this existence, coz existence is the point of the existence at the highest level of reality/existence and from this ultimate purpose derives all other purposes . But I guess from another higher  perspective you can say that existence doesnt matter and none of it matters.

Rajendra chola and Bengalis

Another controversial post

Bengalis are mainly mongoloid tribes(the first to enter india or called ASI) who got mixed with Caucasians(all other caucasians including south indians called ANI) from magadha. Even bengali brahmins(mamta baneerjee) looks that way.

But some 1000 years ago a south indian chola King called Rajendra chola conquered Bengal and the chola army men passed on their genes to the local bengalis.


This guy cud be Kumble’s brother


Thats why many bengalis look like South Indians and think kinda like south indians to an extent. All those varman(barman) kings of bengal may be descendants of the Chola subjects…many chola and pallava kings are also named varman very often.


The cholas did not build temples or make coins there but went out further east to subordinate regions all the way till singapore.

Some instances
1) The khmer empire with rulers like Jaya varman, surya varman and queen jaya chudamani were all offshoots of the chola conquerers. they were the builders of angkor wat ..the names are very tamil, but the origin of khmer empire is not established
2)There are 1000 year old Tamil temples in China & indonesia, and CHolas were the ones who brought Hinduism to indonesia(subramanium swamy)

3) The chinese martial arts were also brought to china from a person in india called Bodhidharman (real name simha varman) a pallava king from kancheepuram
4) there was a siddhar called bogar, who travelled to china to be known as lao-tzu

These days the typical “educated class” bengali is a phony intellectual-midget, who likes to talk incessantly and spurt out things that just feel right in their heads and not logically sound and comprehensive arguments. The chinkyphile british did favours to bengalis by making it the capital and transferring all the funds from the country to build calcutta. They created many Universities and academic institutions with an agenda and to promote theories such as aryan invasion(which has been disproved in academic circles some time back with indepth research in genetic anthropology) etc. They also created a lot of bengali academics and rewarded those who’d buy into their agenda. Thus promoting the bardolok or watever they r called. The funds from the university went in promoting both english and bengali literature, and thus the bengali poets got a recognition like no other regional language. Also bengal with the ganges flowing thru it was a very fertile and resourceful region.
All these factors clearly indicate that bengalis got a huge headstart ahead of others in India in matters of academics and other essential skills. They were also good in kissing upto the british and they even created a surname/title to the best ass-kissers known as biswas. They were excited about the semi-aryan identity that the british gave them which elevated these half-mongoloids in comparison to the south indians. And the rage in this post stems from the fact that it is this particular crowd amongst bengalis( who form a lage academic/media nexus) that is defending the aryan invasion theory full on. This is also aided by the Muslim mafia from bangladesh and pakistan using this theory to serve their agenda as well. But no matter how much they try, we can all see the mongoloid features in them..and the explanation is either that they are half-mongoloid primitve population of India, or east india may be the likely place of origin of caucasian traits

Enemy of the State..i mean the centre

This video is something to do about the below mentioned problem


Why Basic Income for tamils of tamil castes is a solution:

  1. people will be less anxious and that will bring about a lot of change in overall attitude, lifestyle, state of mind.
  2. women need not depend on men
  3. no one has to be exploited and fear starvation or poverty – and hence take up jobs they like
  4. No one is not going to work with just the basic income
  5. even so , tamils have been working so hard – only so that north indian idiots in central govt take up our tax revenue and make fools/slaves out of us.
  6. If industry/opportunity funds reduce as a consequence of this socialist policy taking up funds – its good. TN wont attract leeches from other states and north. Only Tamils in TN
  7. Ambitious tamils will emigrate if there r less opportunities here and they will spread tamil population in other states. This way we get the better of being under invasion from this north indian government.
  8. Generally speaking basic income is good
  9. basic icome reduces crime
  10. In healthy economy wealth/money is supposed to circulate in all sections. But this capitalist push down/trickle down from top is a bad idea. People in the top hold the wealth power and dont distribute it down. If the wealth is directly given down, it will eventually circulate up.
  11. With wealth improved in the bottom layer – the slums areas of the bottom layer and overall all the areas will improve in cleanliness and activity and beauty.
  12. No one will be at the mercy of their superior starting from the lower most layer – people will have more dignity,self-respect,confidence, character, personality etc

—————————–OLDER DRAFT——————————————————————–

People from some states have to slog it out to generate external revenue( i mean bring money from outside the country through skilled work, rather than selling/exporting indian resources to foreigners and claiming to bring revenue), whereas that (tax)revenue is taken away and handed out to bludgers in certain regions, and motivating them to selfishly replicate themselves without contributing productively to the nation and growing at the expense of others. This wouldnt be too much of a problem in a homogenous nation, but India is anything but a homogenous country and this translates a one group taking advantage of other. I cursed bill gates for trying to reduce the population in certain regions of the country, but now im thankful he is planning to sterlise people in certain regions.
Why not a more fair taxation system, where the state govt gets majority of the corporate and income taxes…thereby transferring funds,power and accountability locally..which is also much more easy to manage rather than a centralised control, which is the biggest problem with the current system – the fate and power to influence people in the hands of an unrelated very few in the centre. If the taxes/revenu is shared well…people will be motivated to make things better as the control/funds lies locally.

BTW the above is only 32 % of total revenue(states share), god knows how the rest is being appropriated by the people in Delhi.

Why cant there be limited governance, especially at the centre. Why cant states and the local municipalities be given enough control and power over the development. Why cant they properly privatize essential services rather than the govt having to reluctantly take up all the services. Even if I pay more for private companies, I will have a peace of mind in knowing that the idiots in centre are not mis-appropriating my revenue contribution and acting like they are the masters of me. Seriously the govt giving handouts to poor areas will work only if the country is culturally and demographically homogenous. Otherwise, it will not only appear like one group is taking advantage of the other but many people will actually try to secure more for their own community and take advantage of the others.  First fix the problem of national identity.we all came from Indus valley civilisation? good..but does everyone agree to that and can we expect no bias based on this – i dont think so. Will happily contribute to center handling defence, judiciary and interstate matters. But a centralised planning commission for the whole nations which decides most of who gets what is ridiculous for a non-homogenous country.

I can explain everything, without God

I thought god debate was over a thousand years back, apparently not, shit load of god people around me. They throw back one very big question back at atheists and think they win coz we dont have a good enough answer. Ima try to answer that.

Who created everything? – universe, existence, matter etc

  1. If you say god, who created god? ur answers to that are not so strong compared to my answer which i will give below. Your answers would probably be..god created himself and then everything else. That is 100 % ur assumption, no way proven or true. It could very well be someother god created this god and disappeared, whereas this god exists and controls everything. You could even say a second some other god created that first some other god and disappeared. All these have the same credibility as me saying there are a lot of invisible and dumb goats running around the sky. This sort of reasoning has absolutely no useful outcome.
  2. My answer : Why do you say nothing should be the default state of existence? Whose rule is it that nothing should exist? Whose rule is it that nothing should exist unless someone creates it? There can be a million possible existences eg1. Nothing exists, eg2. 1 thing exists, eg3. 2 things exist, eg 4 10 things exist, eg 5, a billion things exist. I think that maybe we are in the most simplest and probable existence. Nothing exists – is just 1 possibility. Something exists is 99.999999% possibility. Now even when nothing exists, time & space will exist by default and they are infinite dimensions. I dont buy into that relativity subversion. Im with tesla. Only thing that exists according to me is ether(consisting of sub-ethereal particles ( i have explained this in a bit more detail in an other blog but i will mention something briefly here). If ether exists in a certain region in space, for it to get to that position (any position) there must be an energy causing it to be displaced. And assuming that ether with ethereal particles exist like air/atmosphere in our earth – the foundation of all particles – leptons,quarks, baryons etc are all different manifestation/orientation of that energy/force leading to a host of particles and waves formed in the atmosphere of ether – just like how a whirlpool or wind  or drift etc is formed in air. Again. I have explained this in detail in some other blog.  Now most of the energy is locked up within the medium/atmosphere of ether as static energy – the minute one of these static energy wave points is released some sort of a radiation of these energy waves occur which travels and lead in the creation of a new particle elsewhere.So end of problem – just ether exists with energy and all these particles, atoms, trees, cars u see are higher up manifestations of the same. We are all just waves in the medium of ether ( or strings if u go with string theory but im with ether theory). every particle is a static wave of a complex orientation. Dark energy is the energy thats in a grid lock between seevral sub-ethereal particle that can be released when some other disturbance breaks this grid lock. A lot of physicists disagree on a lot of things, fundamental things. I am much more confident of my explanation than that of relativity, sme quantum theory implicatins, string theory implications etc.
  3. Recap Impact theory : Just like how the objective of a force/energy is to cause a disturbance/push or pull and increase entropy in a given region rather than being tied in a single point as stationary/static wave/energy, the inherent objective of every thing – plants, animals, he ones with brains and without brains are also to cause an impact – change in entropy, physical impact, emotional impact etc. And that is out purpose in life – to make an impact. Every other object is a derived objective of making an impact such as self-preservation, pro-creation, other unexplained motivations, getting mate, getting rich, getting strong, getting popular etc etc. evfen economy is all about generating activity.
  4. Now Ultimately nothing matters – whether earth exist, universe exists, whether existence exists….it doesnt matter. So it doesnt ultimately matter if you exist or if ur lineage exists or if ur race exists. This being the case the only thing that makes sense is to chill the fuck up. you can be happy and relaxed for no reason if you realise this.
  5. But practical situations, people come into your life and fuck things up. So if you foresee mostly shitty practical situations for you, you should just end ur life. Killing yourself is a very tragic thought thats gonna cause you sadness till you kill youself, thats why its a thought to be avoided. But if you have shitty practical life, you shud just end it.
  6. The future : no ones gonna believe in god or marriage in 50 years. Man’s destiny is to create AI which will be more impactful than us, just like how we were more impactful than monkeys. So help my AI initiative.

All the above points are explained in depth in various blogs so one should read them too for an indepth understanding


Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑