Stupid Feminist Women

Dear feminist nuisances,
If human males are so bad all over the world with patriarchy, lets go back to the way things are in nature.
No Dog or ape male provides resources,food,security,enmotional support or runs around doing anything at the command for the female.
Infact they just forcibly try to have sex with the female in many cases (look at dogs or squirrels or anything else you may observe) and the females have to defend themselves if they are not interested. In fact, in snakes the male kills a female if it senses that it is carriying the eggs of another male. Even if we go back to that state now, Human females will be at an advantage compared to females of other species.
How? – coz u kave the brain capacity to know that all it takes is one targeted blow to the males crotch and he is going to be permanently damaged for life.
If you had not let yourselves become weaker, you could have ruled us males. But as we got more intelligent since neolithic times, you shitty females tried
to use preganancy as a leverage to take advantage of males but ended up becoming weaker urself.
Even in nature it was the role of females to take care of the offsprings in most cases. But men have agreed to this concpet of marriage where they take up a lot more
responsibility and suppress their natural instincts. A female can have only 1 preganacy in 10 months, but a male can be a part of several pregnancies in that time.
Thats the natural design and the instinct is for males to seek out mates more than females. But we have suppressed that instinct while we agreed for marriage,
and so even if you are earning equal to us and you think you dont need a man to provide security, you owe us for agreeing to enter into the contract of marriage on which occasion you spend 5 lacs for flowers and claim that during divorce settlement.
And finally yet, we dont complain but you do.You know why? coz you know you are inferior physically and intellectually and cannot be as impactful as males
on a level playing field. Hence you bitch and moan and complain and blame like every other inferior groups do. So thats who you are.

Now i know you are going to say that all males – animals are bad – and nature is not fair and just your self-centered view is right. But it only means that you are retarded. Even if you destroy all the species in the world ans start evolution from the scratch ( sexual reproduction with its benefits over asexual species) things would end up just like this. Your retarded sense of a gender balance is only going to bring an end to our species – though we are so intelligent n evolved( compared to other species)making us fitter for survival.

The problem with feminists and most females is they say Men need to start sharing household work as the females themselves are earning these days. We know that we need to share household work if the wife shares the financial burden.The problem with that statement is how this statement is put forward.  They make it sound like for all these years – its the patriarchy that has created this unjust sharing of work load and that this is done by males to dominate and suppress females while the females have big-heartedly allowed them to do so. No idiots – men have protected and provided for you and have competed and fought and died for you doing those things in return that they give u a safe environment with comparatively not much to worry about and suffer. As pointed out above human males have been so noble and have sacrificed a lot for women taking a lot upon themselves. So maybe if you start every statement of yours being grateful…like for example – ” I know that men have provided and protected and sacrificed a lot for us since neolithic times, but..i think it would be better if they take a little bit more household while we work proportionately to what each one brings” , then things would be different – less argument. So its not the thoughtlessness of males but the ungratefulness of females thats the problems today. You deserved to walk behind us, fall in our feets etc in olden times coz we’ve done a lot more for you. Also we are better than you coz we are more impactful than you. We are better than apes coz of our intelligence and more specificaly the impact potential of our intelligence. But evolution of human intelligence is primarily due to the activities of males. females just had to have a healthy body that attracts males. Males had to run around, figuring out a way to be creative to impress and compete and conquer. So yeah we are better than you hormonal psychos.

—–On needyness and erectile dysfunction—————-

Unreasonably demanding something from others and threatening with consequences is the central aspect of various forms of shitty things people do.
Seriously – mankinds destiny is creating AI. At an ultimate level, nihilism prevails. If you are thinking about making it better for mankind – it has got to be in a
society with universal basic income. If you are not working towards either AI or UBI – you just need to chill the fuck up coz you are not really doing anything that is too
critical. I know what some of you idiots are thinking – what about food n energy?- well, israel said that it alone can feed the whole world and we’ve got plenty of sun, so most people in this world are just competing and their jobs are sooo easily disposable in a better society. Like so many other sensible people has said, life is not that important and for some reason or the other a lot of people choose to live.
What a decent human being can do is not keep expecting shit from other people too much. So dont be a jerk in any form – the spouse, the parent,the relatives, the boss,the friends, the government, the moral police….just be chill.
Some people call universal basic income as immoral – you go fuck yourself.

Especially feminist cunt wives of today– you all deserve to suffer miserably. Because you expect too much out of your husbands. Since guys try to woo girls before marriage and are extra nice to them prior to marriage – they expect the same behavior to continue after marriage but even more nicer. Pre-sales and post-sales attitude are always different people. Women act like they are the only ones offering stuff in a relationship. In most relationships today girls offer 10% or less and guys do 90% of the things for women.

Even if you are pregnant, we undergo more by taking up the family burden and by giving importance to the dumb things on your mind. so you women need to get a perspective and stop bothering men you entitled cunts.

Women arent more kind or big-hearted. They just are more emotional and guys are more logical. Dumb, young people are more emotional too – its just the lack of logical thinking bringin many concepts into the thought that makes you dwell on a particular thought alone and in turn become more emotional. So being emotional is an inferior trait you bitches and you dont need to be rewarded for that. You can keep yapping about a hundread different things, but still your thinking is not logical. And all those theories about how women always win the argument and men need to fear women – you win the argument not coz your a genius mastermind who know exactly how to bother people, its just being a bitch. Men always want to find a resolution to things – thats their objective in anything. But the weaklings always just wanna stir up problems( either females or minorities in some societies playing the victim) – and its easy to stir up problems. Especially in a relationship one cannot be happy if the other doesnt, so you just wont stop creating problems until we concede. Thats not really a victory with talent – its victory with bitchy lowest form of behavior. I have been an adamant trouble makes when i was a child, so I know. Especially when someone else organises such a good play, i always get jealous and try to play the role of a trouble makes to undermine what the other has created and try to seek attention. We men know this and you yourselves do, so dont think of yourselves as a clever beings – you are just nagging bitches. Even psychos are of this category – its not that they dont feel remorse or anything. they just want to make an impact – if they do0nt have the talend to make a positive impact, they go about causing shit for others. The really aggressive ones turn to be the serial killers and stuff – this is the psychology of serial killers – not what they show in mind hunters. So all you dumb fuck low life weak women and aggressive but no potential to make a positive impact people – you are not something special. You are the lowest of the low. This applies for atleast 70% of the women today. We need to identify and reward the remaining 30% of women and make them the majority.

Most people and generally simple-minded women claim to be the loving ones in a relationship and blame their partner for not reciprocating. Such women are just like nerds who chase hot women and expect them to love them in return. They dont exactly offer what the other wants/enjoys, but just because they want the other to do exciting things for them they think that they love the other truley and expect the other to love them back. Wanting others to enjoy being your company without you doing anything to amuse them is not love. Thatt is just your expectation. You are not a well-wisher of them.  Only wishing well for the other, genuinley empathising with the other, giving importance to the their ideas and stuff constitues as true love. Many psycho wives keep telling that their husbands dont love them enough and do enough for them. These are just the “expectation psychos”  and they dont have genuine affection for their spouses. Most wives are of this category now. They only genuinely like their children – to them husbands are there to fulfill their needs and expectations and they just offer csome chores in return and not genuine well wishing affection. If you are a well wisher, you will give them space and you wont even have any expectation from them. I mean most people dont really have genuine well-wishing feeling towards anyone else at the begining. Its just attraction and its really just the expectation and you do your best to offer attractive/appealing stuff themselves. But if you wanna get deep in a relationship you need to have this well -wishing feeling. I also think that the x genes dont have the instinct of proper co-operation, and hence altruism ans they havent done that properly in most societies for ages. Women just sat at home and became emotional.


Now for the erectile dysfuncions — not the physical but psychological and porn induced.

Marriage is just a commitment that you wont go spending your energy n resources with other people other than your spouse. But we cant shut ourselves from the media and information. So thats the thing right, we live in the porn age and we are exposed to hundreads of appealing girls per hour on TV and while browsing. This has an effect on us and things can never go back to the way it was 50 years back where married couples have sex a lot of times during the week. Despite all this, if we have a very hot partner, we can have sex as many times a day as the women want. Because the hot spouse will always be confident about her sexuality and what she offers. Even if the novelty factor wears out, she is always confident of what she can offer and this confident makes guys feel like they are getting a good thing there.  But if you are not quite up there, and you are just average – you only have to rely upon the novelty factor to give you confidence in the inital phase and after the novelty wear out, you are insecure and not really confident on what you are offering or bringing to the table. If a guy senses that he is not going to be turned on. Thats it. Psychological ED never occurs with a hot partner. But if it happens, it the womans fault for not bringing enough confidence and appeal to the table. If your parnter has psychological ED or sex life isnt that great, its your fault. I mean even if your a 8 or 8.5 after a 100 or 200 times of sex, things are gonna dull down rite. Only really hot people can bring the appeal even after a 100 times. I man you watch sunny leone’s video – all 100 times she is bringing that appeal in that video and so you are turned on. Its really the reduction in the confidence and appeal you offer thats causing this ladies.



Are females more loving and more good than men?

So when they say women are more loving – what exactly does it mean?
Will they give more of their possessions to the guy than the other way in a relationship?
is it more of their time? emotions? thoughts?more dreams? more passion? – The above comes down to how much time each one has for their own thoughts.
Is it that they move on less sooner after a break up because they love more? – Dont think this is the case
Less likely to break the commitment when something better turns up? – Its not the men vs women here, its the good people vs idiots thing here.
Is it that women would go hungry to feed their kids while men wont?
or will they empathise more of their kids’ suffering than fathers?
Is it that they dwell on or give more importance to someone’s feelings
more than logical things? – Maybe that part but hey its just logic vs emotions and it doensnt mean the father loves his kids less

In those days there were no courts with a constitution that would divide the wealth equally between sons and daughters. The way the wealth was divided was to give it in the form of gold and women oriented things to the daughter when she got married and to give the land to the sons who can manage it…guess what this was called?.  The bargaining/expectation bit was to ensure that the sharing was appropriate so that the parents wudnt keep most of their wealth for their sons and that they wud give sufficient amount to the daughters atleast for fear of shame. It is also superficial to prentend that life is easy for everyone and it is not manly for the guy do expect a little head start from the girls’s side.

For over thousands of years the men have looked to prevent this from happening to women

If you hadnt wached the above video fully it and get some perspective on things.Competition,Conflict and struggle for gathering resources was the responsibility of men. In return for protecting from hardships, the fathers prevented their daughters from going out and face the wrath of greedy aggressive people outside. It is simply unrealistic even today and even more so back in the days to ask a number men stand guard for the protection of a females that feel the need to to go out in the night.

Females who go out in unsafe places  in untime are bound to be attacked the same way a weak male is bound to be attacked/ robbed.

( I bet no white worshipping coconuts saw the above as an issue)

India being a not so rich country has limited resources for law enforcement. But the UN statistics in which India was ranked 131 in HDI revealed the number of rapes per 100000 in India as 1.9 while it was 90 in US and around 75 to 80 in countries like Australia, UK even wil an 85% of the cases unreported in these countries. If you were a women and were born in ancient greece/rome(the most civilised part of ancient west)there was a good chance you became a prostitute or a maid. Not a lot of emphasis on marriage or family there compared to the east.

Only in certain parts in India we have Matriarchy and the smritis begin with the premise that Women are to be protected and treated with respect and hence having to follow a number of norms.Those werent perfect, sometimes went over board in bein restrictive and they certainly donk make sense these days, but originally it was intended for the good and not a patriarchal plot to dominate women. Also, polyandry(women having many husbands ) was prevalent only in india whereas polygamy in middle east and in europe meant only males can have multiple wives.

Yet today we all know how bad and immoral Indian men are and how mightly and righteous the westerners are.

Women drool over guys like brad pitt and ryan gosling…the aggressive natured european type who had been war-mongerers and who raped and pillaged a lot of native population of the  world at a cancerous rate.

Generally speaking males can procreate more times than females (because unfortunately only the female has to bear the child), and the instituion of marriage is slightly not so favourable for the male nature. yet indian men have respected the institution of marriage more and longer than western civilisations. Indian culture is inherently feminine and it can be observed from the non-aggressive nature  of indian men. But in the name of feminism, free-thinking etc a lot amongst indians like to bash indians ness and indian culture. There are two kinds of people in these groups…one white worshipping coconuts who look upto all things white, evaluate India through the western lens, and try to gain popularity, and feel important by putting down everything indian/native and trying to imitate the west. And then theres the other kind who despite not having any bad intentions, are drawn towards these politically correct righteous concepts since they are not really that intelligent and lack critical thinking. Dowry, slavery, feudalism existed throughout the world and atleast in india literal slavery didnt exist for a long time and caste system was just a way of avoiding the concentration of power,wealth within one group. However these so called thinkers always attribute the evils to indian culture/way of thinking. Either way these people are short-sighted and are a huge burden to India as a whole.


Blog at

Up ↑