So Tesla is considered by many to be the best so far, who didnt get the recognition coz he didnt get along with the others in the scientific community. Tesla n einstein would exchange insults more than how people do in forums such as Topix. Anyhu, this is about the Theory of everything(TOE) in physics, something about what I believe – Im inclined towards ether theory and somethings that come to mind on these issues. First – the lastest version of TOE is called string theory 5.0 or somethign where they say that the Matter are strings vibrating in 11 dimensions. The 11 dimension thing is purely mathematical – to make their pointless equations fit, whereas according to their logic – theoretically there could be millions of dimensions. But lets focus on the Major part – Strings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B0Kaf7xYMk Now with the string theory – we are assuming a lot more than the ether theory and we still havent unified matter and energy yet. For example consider the photon..it has a string there are waves within the string which is the energy component which makes it vibrate. When they say light moves at velocity ‘c’ is it the velocity of string travelling through space? if so what does the velocity of the waves with the string account for? What exactly is the nature of the strings..I mean when they combine with other strings like a chappathi dough, how exactly is the bonding taking place. More importantly – the fundamental energy – is it acting within the string and making it vibrate or is it responsible for making the string travel in space? Now Matter( a substance that occupies space) they say can be converted to energy. Force( and energy thats the consequence of force or a potential of force) is something that can cause a push or a pull (on a medium/substance). How can we visualise A formless push being converted into a Form occupying a space??? Ever heard of thing like photon pair to electron-positron annihilation , or even Nuclear reactions..these are all mass(not matter) getting converted to energy and vice versa. What the ether theory says is this.. Imagine a rope wave .. the wave is the energy and it travels in a medium of the rope. The particles of the rope are not displaced permanently from their relative positions to their neighbouring particles unless the rope breaks. Ether theory says the same that the fundamental particles are nothing but the waves of energy vibrating in the medium called ether. When scientists say fundamental particles, they havent exactly touched it and confirm that they occupy space, They have only detected it by making its impact felt on other matter. The Force has different orientations,directions,intensity the different combinations denoting different particles. just like how in an orbital motion there are 2 components – centrifugal and centripetal forces, just like how there are different components in a toroidal vertex or just like how harbhajans bowling has spin,elevation and line, each particle has different component forces..and these forces manipluate into different quantum properties such as spin, charge, mass…which are really just different orientations of force. I mean a charge could be a force/counter force oriented in Y axis and mass could be something oriented in the Z axis and a spin is something oriented in the x-axis. Many of you may ask so if you turn a magnet 90 degrees will you get electrocuted?? I dont mean it that way…With respect to a fundamental particle, its mass may be a force oriented in one dimension and a charge in another dimension…after all charge,mass and spin all exert a force onto other things around them. And with so many possible directions and orientations..we have infinite fundamental particles..which is exactly what the people at CERN are discovering everyday..I mean they are trying to make a pointless classifications and define the property of each of the stable/ unstable particles..but the underlying concept is that they are different manifestations/orientation of Force. A photon(plain energy) getting converted into charge and mass ( photon annihilation), and conversion of matter to energy can all be explained by this phenomenon. So A particle is basicallly a bundled up, stable energy in a position( imagine a hurricane/cyclone, or multi-harmonic static wave). But the point here is it is only a push or a pull and its effect has to be on a medium that fills space( i mean there could be space without this medium, but no EM wave would be able to travel in it). Previously people rejected that Ether exist because to light to travel so fast it shud be highly dense and 0 viscous. This is like saying an iron bar/or any dense fluid medium has to be zero viscous since sound travels through it pretty fast. They dont understand ether doesnt have to be zero viscous coz its not just the medium of light, but the medium of all of us and all things. …The point is Every form that we see, is just energy which is shifting its position in ether – I mean to say that every second the ether space next to you is getting converted into you, and the ether space you presently occupy is getting converted into the person standing next to you ( or rather is getting occupied by the stable/stationary force waves that make up the form of the person next to you). Are you able to picture that? So when some particles( packed up combination of forces) become unstable by virtue of extra force coming into/getting lost in one dimension/component, the entire particle collapses by releasing this energy/force which travel to other position and impact or form other particles. lets look at the theories of mainstream people who rejected ether. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment#Theory_and_fallout Michelson, who was supposed to be a great guy who found out the light speed and did the cornerstone experiment on which all modern theories thereafter was based on, was not even smart enough to correclty identify the distance traveled by the light in his experiment( i mean this is basic 10 th std math stuff if you see the diagram in above link). No one knows if that experiments were credible and becoz of this that the light speed is constant in all inertial reference frames is under question. One can play ping-pong inside a moving train because,the ball gains and loses velocity in the corresponding directions to make up for the relative motion of the people inside the train(as compared to someone in the ground). It could be that the light/photons also gains or loses speed( this is another way of accounting for the stationary ether wind via earth’s gravity)..in case ur surprised, what do you think refraction in water/prism effect is? speed of light is slowed in lenses,water etc. If one were to go with special theory of relativity – imagine the following thought experiment. In space lets consider a garage and car which is like 90% the lenght of garage. The car has some wings attached half-way through so that the wings will stop the car before it can enter the garage completely(only 45% of the garage will be occupied when the wings stop the car). Lets say the car is moving at 95% speed of light.. Now the person sitting in the car wud imagine that the garage is moving towards him and so the garage should shrink by 70% (or watever the formula mandates) and hence the car bumper will touch the end wall of garage before the wings could stop his car from entering completely. The person leaning on garage wall would think that since car is moving so fast, the car will shrink and the wings will stop the car from hitting the garage wall. So which will happen?? If you think you can answer that cartoonishly imagining expansion and contraction after collision..i can extend the scenario with piezo-electricity of the garage and point out an anomality where one person sees red and another person sees green. So I think STR is bullshit and so is einsteins space getting bent theory GTR – as i prefer the gravitational and other forces bending light rather than space getting bent. I mean everyone can see light bending in water, prism and around sharp edges due to interaction with forces within the Water/prism medium etc. Why would einstein think of space getting bent?? and time getting bent and going back in time to give your grandma a watch, which she gave you when you were a kid, which she got from the future you and so no one knows when the watch was actually manufactured n shit. The properties of ether are the one yet to be deciphered correctly and thats what Tesla wanted the scientific community to investigate on. So this is what i believe..All particles and their quantum properties are only different manifestation(direction,orientation like circular or linear or spin) of these Fundamental force waves in the medium known as ether. EM wave-particles may or may not travel at variable speeds – within the medium of ether( depends on the final version of the morley experiment – i mean i can give a link which has totally different results from the first MM experiment) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E
- they say that strings can attach and detach – not explaining how attachment and detachment is possible(are there other forces/particles coming into play for this?).
- It does not say anything about the property of the string ie to which extent the string can stretch(as it allows waves in it) and what are the factors behind the tension in the string and what is the string made of?
- It does not specify if the waves within the string contribute the EM energy waves or if the Movement of the string as a whole constitutes the EM energy propogation. ( i meaning the rope wave – are they saying that the wave movement as energy propogation or are they claiming the whole rope movement as travel of photons and EM carriers?)
- Assuming the wave nature of EM wave propogation( assume that the EM waves travelling like ripples in the pond) are they saying that a single string stretches in circumference as the wave propogates???? or miraculously a number strings of differente photons combine in perfect coordination and in phase while the EM waves propogate?
- Regarding an EM field..it is a contiuous field in space..if only interactions of strings are responsible of energy propogation, no field can ever exist in empty space and all energy propogation will be like conduction or convection of these strings and the concept of radiation is not possible.
While the ether theory has only one ambiguity which i have already mentioned and which is the same as the second point of string draw back – which is that we do not know for sure the properties of the medium. Like tesla said, the only place we are stuck up is the medium of the EM waves. The medium no doubt has to have substance in space upon which energy can act . when we investigate into why the speed of light is ‘c’ we will have more answers i guess. The problem rite now is..neither the ether theory or the String theory is testable and the underlying medium be detectable. Recollecting the copenhagen interpretation…I think that the the experiments conducted and the thories built so far by the Physics society is far from being a perfect or a accurate desription of a lot of things in physics. Not saying this coz im not from the west. Im sorry this is all the facts i could get from high schools physics, which I had taken physics fro my UG or PG so that I could have wondered more technically n intelligently in these matters. But dont worry, a blog also coming up on something that had something to do with my Masters too. To Conclude, I think the scenario is infinite space and some regions filled with ethereal subparticles with a density( which may be the higgs field density) and there is the force which disturbs these higgs particles, without the need of a restoring force unlike in the objects we observe. The different orientations of force gives rise to different manifestations of movement(waves) gives rise to different fundamental particles – every thing from quarks to leptons. Maybe the etheral sub-particles are made of other stuff too on a smaller scale, but that is not the discussion here. All the known fundamental particles are different manifestations of the force of the same ethereal medium.
The density of sub-ethereal particles is so high, but it doesnt necessarily have to maintain the density. The variation in sub-ethereal density is what makes up the dynamicity of things at the quantum level ( or rather not such a continuous flow of things at that level). Watch the simulation below to know what im talking about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECkG_JdodMA&index=77&list=FL0vOaYrAflXpqken2DtCtow
To the question of where space and matter exists, – the answer is the question why shouldnt it exist? Why should there be nothingness as default? Time goes on forever. Space is also infinite. Its just that matter and force happen to exist in certain regions of space. Can there be anything else other than matter and force or space ? – i dont know, will put it here if i think of something else that can exist . Just dont let these current generation of physicists fool you with their BS about big bang and things coming out of nothing and time and space has start and end and the existence of 100 or infinite dimension, parallel universe etc…i’d sooner believe that god exist than their BS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORUUqJd81M
Jim Holt in the above video says that our existence is one of many possible existence. But I say that Ours is the most likely possible existence. Let me explain. According to this above theory, the only things that exist are sub-ethereal particles and the force/energy that makes them move. Time and space are just scales and they are infinite. Now the ‘nothing should exist’ is a possibility that has a very small percentage probability as opposed to ‘something exists’ . Coz theres no reason for nothingness to be default state and ‘something exists’ as a default state requires no reason. So in this ‘something exists’ – we have the simplest something which is the sub-ethereal particles and the force that displaces its position. I mean if these particles move – it only means there is energy. There is no reason for these ethereal particles not to be able to move. So we have the most probable, simplest existence – atleast the sub-ethereal theory brings it down to this. This notion will be challenged only if we discover that the ether filler space is bounded by something else. We(right to the fermions and leptons) are like vertices in a sea, we cannot exist outside of the sea, so if something else bounds the ether sea, we may not be able to gauge those.
Now with any existence, there is automatically a concept/logic/purpose built into it. ie if you have an existence , you cannot say there is no purpose behind the constituents of the existence. Here https://jayanpsk.wordpress.com/2014/05/04/purpose-of-life/ I have made a case as to why the purpose of life force or the purpose of any force is to make an impact. If you say there is no purpose to existence leptons n quarks – you are incorrect coz without them the current existence would not be. Since our ‘most likely existence’ exists rather than nothing, There is a puropse for existence of leptons n quarks, and if leptons and quarks have a purpose so do our lives – which is simply to make an impact – and this purpose of our life matters. In other words, from an ultimate level you cannot say that there is purpose to everything thats happening or none of it matters. It all matters at your everyday practical level as well as from an ultimate existential perspective. I mean what im trying to do is refute the kinda things anti-natal people say – they say we should just stop breeding and stop existing. if we should stop existing – so should the animals – and so should every life form – and so do every atom or quarks or leptons – and so should ether/energy. And if it does, our existence will cease to be. But it shouldnt n cant go away coz this is the most likely of all possible existence.As existence exist, every constituent has its purpose at different levels of abstraction and so at an Ultimate level there is a purpose to existence of everything. You cannot say there is no point to this existence, coz existence is the point of the existence at the highest level of reality/existence and from this ultimate purpose derives all other purposes . But I guess from another higher perspective you can say that existence doesnt matter and none of it matters.